Archive - Music RSS Feed

House of the Rock

July 19, 2011 in Emerging Church, Lutheran Church, Music, Worship with 1 Comment

Psalm 62:2 – God alone is my rock and my salvation, my fortress; I shall never be shaken.

This past weekend, I took a crew of Lutherans from my church (mostly from our worship band) down to Lutheran Church of the Redeemer in downtown Atlanta.  This is a church known for its age, its size, and its marble columns. For years they’ve had a “contemporary service”, which seems to be yet another blended worship experience (a.k.a. “everybody loses”) somehow involving a jazz trio…

Yeah, I don’t know either.

Anyway, we went down because a few friends from AFFIRM are working on a fresh worship experience in Redeemer’s basement:  House of the Rock.  The goal seems to be in line with what I’ve been advocating for some time – a modern, yet liturgical Lutheran worship experience.  You may be thinking “blended”, but let me explain what I mean.

Liturgy can be defined differently depending on who you’re talking to, but the consensus when differentiating between a “liturgical” and a “non-liturgical” church seems to have to do with liturgical churches having a somewhat standardized order of activities during worship or, at the very least, a standardized set of activities that occur in some order.  In ELCA Lutheran churches, this order is more or less:

  1. Gathering
  2. Word
  3. Meal
  4. Sending

From my perspective, these four components make a Lutheran service, well, Lutheran. They can occur in any order, but they should all happen at some point. Sunday night’s worship experience at House of the Rock provided all four components somewhat seamlessly, with all components having a modernized and updated feel to them.

Let me point out a few things that make this worship experience seem “modern”, to me:

  • Darkness - A little darkness goes a long way in worship. The folks at House of the Rock get this. They painted the ceiling black, blocked out ambient light from the windows, and set up their own lighting. Their service is in the evening, which also helps them out some. This is a huge departure from the “norm” at most Lutheran churches. At my own church, for example, we have a giant window just behind the stage. The walls are all white. Our service is at 10:45am. It is bright in there. I understand the arguments for having sunlight in the church – seeing the beauty of God’s creation, etc. The issue I have with an extraordinarily bright worship space is that people feel less “free” to express their worship. The brighter the worship space, the less comfortable worshipers will feel expressing worship to God in a way that differs from the majority of the congregation. The darker the worship space, the easier it is for people to forget about the other worshipers around them and focus on the One who is worthy of worship.
  • Modern Music - This is probably a bit of a no-brainer, but the music on Sunday night was spot-on. Lyrically repetitive, yet musically dynamic – allowing worshipers to learn the songs as they were singing them, even if they didn’t already know them. The other trick is that the volume of the music was such that you couldn’t hear the person next to you singing. This goes back to my darkness statements above… the more we can do to get worshipers to forget about the people around them, the better. The goal is to create an environment that allows worshipers to focus on God. If the music is quiet, people feel more self-conscious about their own singing, knowing that the person next to them can hear them.
  • Casual Vibe - Modern churches have a more “come as you are” approach to worshiping God, reinforcing the idea that worship can and should happen often, regardless of location, appearance, etc. Churches that push for formality – whether through musical instrumentation, attire, language, etc. – create a stuffy worship atmosphere. We were made for worship. Adding formality to it makes worship seem difficult – even less accessible. Using very formal language in church dialogues makes worshipers feel disconnected from the text. Having a pastor in a robe can make worshipers feel like the pastor is somehow closer to God than they can ever get. Even hymns create a disconnect. How many people listen to organ music during the rest of the week? Worship should connect people to God in the context of their own lives. The less connected people feel during Sunday worship, the easier it is for people to feel like worship is something that just happens on Sundays. If what they see, hear, feel, and experience during a worship service is put in familiar language, using familiar attire and familiar music styles, people are more likely to see worship as an ongoing experience – something that can happen anywhere at any time.
  • Conversational Sermon – I find that many pastors sound like they’re teaching a class. This academic style of sharing the Word is another immediate disconnect created during many worship services. Sunday night’s experience at House of the Rock was far different. The presentation of the Word was (in my humble opinion) theologically spot-on while being delivered conversationally and casually. It felt more like hanging out with the pastor and chatting than some sermons I’ve heard. The world isn’t changing, the world has changed. The way people receive information today is far different than it was even ten years ago. People engage in various communities and play tug-of-war with ideas. The conversation is global and interactive. This is how today’s generation is used to learning and growing. Our pastors need to get on board with this.

Regardless of the stylistic trimmings and presentation methods, we gathered in His name, received the Word of God, came to the table for communion, and were sent out to serve.

Gathering.
Word.
Meal.
Sending.

Just because it’s modern doesn’t make it less liturgical.

I’m personally grateful for the effort these guys have put into planning and executing this worship experience. I hope it catches on. It’s filling a gap that has existed for some time within the Lutheran church. Moreover, I can honestly say that it had a quality to it that I’ve only experienced at bigger (and better-funded) churches. If you’re in the Atlanta area, definitely check it out!

It’s Been Just Over A Year…

July 13, 2011 in Emerging Church, Lutheran Church, Music, Tech, Worship with 2 Comments

It’s been just over a year since my last post here. I’ve spent the last year working hard on several “projects” which I felt the need to focus on. Yeah, I probably could have blogged along the way, but I find my days don’t have enough hours in them anyway. Ignoring this site was a conscious decision – an attempt to streamline my activities so I could focus my attention on making some key changes.

For starters, I got a new job… sort of. I ended up going back to work for the company I’ve spent the vast majority of my working life at. I resigned from there a couple of years ago and moved to Atlanta. After I started a new job here, my old company began to contact me. Ultimately I worked out a deal that would allow me to stay in the Atlanta area and work for them in what appears (at least so far) to be much better circumstances. At the moment I work from home (or from the Land of a Thousand Hills coffee shop), which is great considering how wild my work schedule can be.

Beyond my work, I have my second (unpaid) job:  church. The goal I set for myself for this last year was to assess my abilities and figure out how to plug my abilities into needs at my church. I feel like I have a few things to offer:  music, business (especially in marketing and communications), and project planning and management. So, here’s what’s going on there:

Worship Music
I really wanted this year to be a whole new phase in contemporary worship music development at my church. During the Easter service in 2010, I had a glimpse of the potential we had to get something really great going. Up to that point I had been on the fence – getting fairly cynical about the process of developing a contemporary worship experience in a Lutheran church. Easter was the turning point. I decided that I was either going to cut my ties and go elsewhere, or commit 100% to trying to develop the service into what it could be. I chose to commit to it and have worked diligently to “step our game up” at the contemporary service. We gained a couple of new band members and attended a worship seminar led by Paul Baloche. I feel like we now have a shared vision for the service’s music and its potential. There is still a lot of work to be done, but I’ve never been closer to my goal than I am now.

Worship Service Planning
Similar to the above, I had a goal of making some progress on the planning of our contemporary worship services. My thought was that if I could get one or two services to be planned as a group with the best ideas from the group being executed successfully, I’d have a couple of good examples I could point to as “the right way” and could take action to push both church staff and volunteers to commit time and energy to planning our worship services each week. I feel like I’ve met half of this goal. Good Friday and Easter 2011 were the best planned, most meaningful and impactful (yes I know that’s not a word) services I can remember attending at any Lutheran church. I know the congregation recognized it too, based on the feedback. The problem is, the amount of time and energy required by a handful of people to get those services together was far greater than it needed to be. I want to spread this effort out to a larger group in order to minimize the amount of time and energy required by the few who are involved in the process currently. This hasn’t happened yet. I had every intent of writing up a plan to get this done – but the task has recently been put on the back burner while I work on a few other things.

Church Communications
Our church web site sucks. It’s sucked for a long time. I realized that I should stop complaining about it and start doing something about it. So, I whipped up some stuff in WordPress and presented it to the staff. It’s been received well. I’ve involved a few other people (because I do NOT want to be the “church web site guy”) and the development is progressing well. My hope is that I can get a number of volunteers trained up to take the site over once development is complete. I don’t need another job, and I don’t need web site management pulling me away from other activities I feel are a better use of my time. HOWEVER, the work on the church web site has exposed many other issues within the church – namely, the lack of any sort of communications plan. Our church is easily 10-15 years behind the communications curve. Our church secretary uses templates to produce bulletins and newsletters. She posts these to the church web site (the ONLY dynamic part of our church web site). Nevermind the clear technology  gap that needs to be bridged – it’s clear to me that our church doesn’t really have a clear voice. Each scrap of material that gets published is written by someone different – and each has a spin applied to it that seems intended only for current church members. It’s growing more and more apparent to me that when my church communicates, the only audience in mind is themselves. This needs to change. Beyond changing the audience, I believe my church needs to change its message. If I had to sum up the current message of our church based on everything we publish and announce, it would be:  ”we’re reluctantly trying to be more youthful and contemporary so that we don’t lose people to some other church.” This is obviously not the message we need to be sending. We actually do have several community-oriented pockets of activity within our church. What I’d love to see happen is for these pockets to grow from the bottom up and to gradually change the culture of our church from being inward-focused to being outward-focused. As this culture changes, so will our message. Then… we’ll finally have something truly of value to communicate out to the world.

None of these are “small” tasks. I think I’m to the point now where I’m making progress with each of them, and I have some (fuzzy) goals I’d like to reach over the next year. Just as I made a conscious decision to NOT blog over the last year, I’m making a conscious decision TO blog this year. I’m hoping that by writing out my progress, it will push me to drive harder to the goals. I’m also hoping that discussions and feedback will pop up here and there to help me when I feel “stuck”.

Here we go…

Lutherans And “Blendered” Worship

October 14, 2009 in Emerging Church, Lutheran Church, Music, Worship with 1 Comment

My wife and I managed to get married without receiving a blender as a wedding gift. I know I know, you’re shocked. Ultimately, we ended up buying a cheap one which we use very rarely. I mean really, how often do I need a mush of multiple ingredients? We use it for fruit smoothies on occasion, but that’s about it.

The thing about a blender is that what you pour out of it is only as tasty as what you put into it. A fruit smoothie is good because the flavors you’re putting into it are complimentary to each other. All the blender does is combine them.

Blending, in and of itself, doesn’t produce positive results. The results come from combining flavors that work well together.

“Blended worship” is a phrase which is often overused, especially in the Lutheran church. For a church that’s historically slow to change, blended worship sounds like a great idea. You take aspects of a contemporary service and aspects of a traditional service and combine them for a tasty frappuccino of worship goodness. It’s a compromise. Everybody wins, right? And, it means we don’t have to commit! We’re not contemporary, so we don’t scare off the traditionalists. We’re not traditional, so we should see droves of young people flocking to our services any day now.

Seriously! Any day now. Really, any moment. Just wait, they’re coming… No really, they are!

What happens if you take a banana, a handful of strawberries, and a jar of pickles, and blend them all together? All are fine on their own, but combining them might not produce appealing results. Worship is much the same. Worship music, song lyrics, dialog language, prayers, sermons… all can have various and unique flavors. Combining them in a way that encourages worship requires similar skill and instinct as that of the chef knowing what ingredients to combine and, more importantly, what ingredients not to combine.

Many churches seem to move to this blended approach because they’re trying to make everybody happy. The end result, at least from my experiences, is the exact opposite. Nobody is happy. The folks over at stuffchristianslike.net bring up this phenomenon in #424 of their list of stuff Christians like. The author hits the nail on the head when he mentions that both parties lose when you compromise. I sense more frustration in blended worship services than I do in worship services that seem to commit to a single consistent style and language.

To make matters worse, I’ve seen many Lutheran churches claim to have a contemporary service only to walk in and find a blended one. This seems to happen a lot as these churches try to transition from traditional to contemporary. Many of them create an additional service for the contemporary approach but a combination of factors might prevent it from reaching its full potential. It may be that they have worship service planners who still think traditionally. It may be that they have a mixed bag of attendees at the contemporary service and they feel the need to cater to all of them. It may be that they just don’t understand what “this contemporary thing” is all about.

Whatever the reason, I often see these services becoming a confusing mix of language, music, lyrics, and “vibe”. The best advice I can give is this:  commit. If you’re helping to plan a contemporary service, start fresh! Don’t just take your traditional service and add a few Hillsong tunes and call it a day. Don’t just take your traditional responsive readings and try to spice them up. Think creatively. Find other creative people in your church and get them involved. Take risks!

Don’t blend things that shouldn’t be blended. Some flavors are better on their own.

Liturgy: Beauty and Beast

July 2, 2009 in Lutheran Church, Music with 17 Comments

Not long ago, I attended a contemporary worship leader conference with some big names in modern worship. Matt Maher was one of the key participants. For those who don’t know, Matt Maher is best known as the author of the song Your Grace is Enough. This song is played in modern worship settings in countless churches every week. I just checked, and Christian Copyright Licensing International (CCLI) lists it at #13 in their CCLI Top 100. If you tune to a Christian radio station, give it maybe 20 minutes, and I bet you’ll hear it. Especially if your Christian radio station is as repetitive as mine…

I only say this to establish this fact:  in terms of modern worship, Matt Maher is A Big Deal.

That being said, Matt Maher is also Catholic. I’ve always found this to be amazing. I’ve been leading groups with this song since its release and when I heard he was Catholic, I was somewhat amazed. Here’s a snippet of his lyrics:

Great is Your faithfulness O God of Jacob
You wrestle with the sinner’s restless heart
You lead me by still waters into mercy
Where nothing can keep us apart

So remember Your people
Remember Your children
Remember Your promise O God

For Your grace is enough
Yeah Your grace is enough
Yeah Your grace is enough
Yeah Your grace is enough for me

Now, his Catholic background amazes me for a couple of reasons. One, quite simply, is theology, but that’s beyond the scope of this post.

The other is that he’s written a driving, pulsing, lively worship song that is embraced by churches across the denominational spectrum… and he’s done it all while being a part of a church steeped in age-old traditions and rituals… and organs. Such a dichotomy.

Maher is also interesting because he’s brilliant. Seriously, brilliant. A small group of conference attendees (perhaps a dozen of us were in the room) sat and listened to him talk for a couple of hours one day. I’m not sure I saw him breathe at all. The man has an amazing memory. Combine this with unique insight and wit and you’ve got someone that I can listen to for a while.

What was he talking about for 2 hours? Liturgy.

Completely off the cuff.

With no notes.

At all.

I thought the talk was going to be about meshing modern worship with traditional churches, at least that’s what I was hoping for. He never got to that topic (which he apologized for later). Instead, he walked us through the entire church calendar of the Catholic church, a calendar almost identical to that of the Lutheran church. And through this odd, lively Catholic, I found an appreciation for liturgy.

Maher addressed the fact that many “modern” churches are attempting to throw off “old” traditions in order to meet new generations where they are. His opinion seemed to be that while this approach may be successful in the short-term, these churches ultimately end up either bringing back some elements of these traditions later on or simply creating new ones that seem very similar to the old ones. He seemed to be saying that if you’re just going to come back to the same traditions you threw off, why throw them off to begin with?

He began to discuss the liturgical calendar of the church as an example of this, but I don’t think he ever got around to tying it back to his original point. Primarily because he was so clearly passionate about the liturgical calendar, that he distracted himself right out of the original topic of the discussion. And none of us seemed to mind…

Maher understood the liturgical calendar so well that he saw beauty in it. The liturgy follows the life of Christ from birth to ministry to death to resurrection and the descending of the Holy Spirit. It gives the church a way to ensure nothing gets missed, as the entire life of Christ is important to the walk of a Christian. Maher stepped through this calendar section by section, from memory, and with a passion that was contagious. Through him, I began to see the beauty in it as well.

While I can definitely see a beauty now in the liturgy, it still prompts some questions from me. The biggest question I have on this is:  how can the church ensure contextual relevance if it is locked into a set path through the scriptures? In non-liturgical churches, pastors discern the needs of the congregations in their care and select scriptures and teachings appropriate for those needs. But in a liturgical setting, the scriptures have already been selected. Wanna’ know what the sermon is for this week? It’s Mark 6:1-13. Wanna’ know next week’s? And the weeks after that? It’s all mapped out. We’ve got it all covered. Some Lutheran pastors, I’ve noticed, force themselves to “lock in” with the liturgical calendar and won’t stray from it. So while the church may have a need to hear a certain scripture or a certain topic addressed by the pastor, they may not be able to get it since the pre-selected scripture for that week has already been determined. Or worse still, a pastor may discern the need correctly and attempt to force the pre-selected scripture to fit an application that is out of place. These square-peg-round-hole sermons are immediately noticeable.

So while I see that a non-liturgical church can miss some important aspects in the scriptures as they strive to maintain contextual relevance, I also find that the occasional lack of contextual relevance in a liturgical church seems to be missing something. Is it possible to get the best of both worlds?

What Makes Me New?

July 1, 2009 in Lutheran Church, Music, Worship with 2 Comments

IMG_1506

Old in the shadow of new.

So we’ve established (and I believe we can all agree) that the Lutheran church is old. So, what makes me so new?

For one, my age. I’m a 20-something, soon to be 30-something, meaning I fit into a demographic that is largely missing (forgotten? ignored?) in the Lutheran church. I can’t blame this entirely on the Lutheran church of course. 20-30 something males is a demographic largely missing in ALL churches, not just Lutheran ones. However, from personal experience (your mileage may vary), I’ve found that some other denominations (and yes I count “non-denominational” here) seem to do a better job of reaching out to my particular demographic. I’m sure at some point I’ll get into the “why?” of all this, but that’s beyond the scope of this particular post.

Another thing that makes me “new” is the time I’ve spent in Lutheran churches. I was raised in Southern Baptist churches and have only recently migrated to the Lutheran church for my wife. I say recently, but it’s been about 8 years now. So, I feel it’s long enough to have learned a few things about the church, and short enough to still consider myself “new”. One of the things I’ve found is that most Lutherans I encounter, especially in the south, were either born into it quite literally, or came over from a Catholic upbringing. In either case, most Lutherans seem very comfortable in the traditional Lutheran church environment because they’ve spent most of their lives either in the same environment or in one that feels very similar even if the theology differs.

Since I essentially defected from the Baptist church, I don’t feel “at home” in a traditional liturgical setting. I could barely spell liturgy until I joined the Lutheran church. The robes looked funny. The constant sitting down and standing up was tiring. Even the language seemed different. My Baptist church sang old hymns. My Lutheran church sang OLDER hymns. My Baptist church dunked. My Lutheran church sprinkled. My Baptist church had parent/baby dedications. My Lutheran church had confirmations. My Baptist church had a Bible. My Lutheran church had a BIGGER Bible… and a Lutheran Book of Worship… and a Catechism or two…

It all seemed pretty foreign to me. But hey… I’m new. I figured I’d get used to it, but I don’t know that I ever will.

The bottom line for me is that while I recognize that the message of Christ is timeless, the church should recognize that the delivery of this message may not be.

Let’s take hymns as an example. Hymns have been, and will continue to be, an important tool for churches to ensure that the church body is communally exalting Christ and proclaiming the word of God publicly. I get it. I understand the purpose of them. However, have you read a hymn lately? Especially an old hymn traditionally espoused by an old Lutheran church? The English language has changed so much over the years that quite frankly, the words of these hymns make very little sense to me now. Granted, I may just be too dumb to understand them, but even when I can understand them, they don’t feel like my words. They don’t feel like they come from me. Is this really what I want to say to God in song? The text in the Bible that I read is newer than most of the hymns that are sung in a traditional service in a Lutheran church. I remember hating hymns when I was a kid growing up Baptist and those hymns seem like rock songs compared to the ancient songs being sung in some Lutheran services I’ve attended. Beyond the lyrics not making much sense in the context of today’s society, the music makes very little sense. As a musician, I find the tone and the pacing of the music of most old hymns to be completely inappropriate for a worshipful mindset. Why would I sing a song of praise in a slow, march-like, minor key? This is the same sort of musical approach that the writers of a funeral dirge would take. Most of these songs are not timeless classics, they’re just plain old.

Even the buildings themselves and the trimming of the interiors seem to be begging people to be uncomfortable. You walk through a big red door and all of a sudden you enter another world filled with wood and stone and robes and strange colored stoles… oh yeah, and organs. I find myself distracted by all of this. I’m supposed to be focusing on God, or on my own need for grace, or on the sacrifice Christ made, and instead I can’t stop thinking about how weird it is that the pastor is wearing a funny little rope around his waist. I don’t think I’m alone here. I don’t think I’m just being insensitive. I’m sure that all of this tradition has a purpose. It’s just that instead of being symbolic for me, it’s a distraction from what I believe should be the central focus of worship on a Sunday morning (or any other time for that matter). Some may argue that it’s because I don’t understand the symbolism. Believe me, I do. I’m inquisitive by nature so when I don’t understand something I ask or read up on it. I understand the intended symbolism for much of what I’ve mentioned here. But understanding the intent of it doesn’t mean that it works for me.

Why does so much tradition get handed down through the life of the church? Why is it so slow to adopt new traditions, as long as they don’t compromise the message? It seems like the churches that are reaching my demographic are the ones that are sort of continually reforming themselves, stripping away the trapping and trimmings of tradition while trying to stay true to the message of Christ. What would Luther say to this? Would he have 95 theses for today’s church? Would he be out of line if he nailed them to the door of my own church?